Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by marky982 View Post
    singnet does traffic shaping and bittorrent is heavily controlled.
    um.. he did direct ONT and he's like getting high speed. so nothing to do with singtel already?
    Whatever floats your boat...

  2. #17
    [R][E][S][P][E][C][T] static369's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Queenstown
    Posts
    2,263
    Hi Guys,

    I have not solved but improved my situation. I have tried connecting directly to the ont, ont--->ac6u and ont--->aztech--->ac68u

    I am not getting any speed differences between any of the above mentioned setups. Currently on the last setup as I need the wifi to be near my room. Aztech has wifi turned off.
    With such a setup, the only conclusion I can come to is that throttling of U torrent? Still in the midst of configuring the ac68u and port forwarding.

  3. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by static369 View Post
    ....
    With such a setup, the only conclusion I can come to is that throttling of U torrent? Still in the midst of configuring the ac68u and port forwarding.
    Well, we believes u already took the effort on setting ""Enabling Protocol Encryption, uTP (UDP Packets) and Increasing Speed Via Max Half Open Connections"" too?

    Checkout this to understanding more on these issues @ Dealing with Bittorrent traffic shaping/blocking by your ISP
    Last edited by w0wb0w; May 15th, 14 at 11:08 PM.
    24/7/365 Powered By :
    (>'-')> Sophos_UTM + fq_codel <('-'<)
    ┏(°>°)┛ RIPE Atlas Probe ┗(°<°)┓
    /˚>˚/ PRTG ...etc \˚<˚\

    ^-(ツ)-^

  4. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by static369 View Post
    Hi Guys,

    I have not solved but improved my situation. I have tried connecting directly to the ont, ont--->ac6u and ont--->aztech--->ac68u

    I am not getting any speed differences between any of the above mentioned setups. Currently on the last setup as I need the wifi to be near my room. Aztech has wifi turned off.
    With such a setup, the only conclusion I can come to is that throttling of U torrent? Still in the midst of configuring the ac68u and port forwarding.
    wait from what i am reading with direct ONT u get the speed u desire right? if that's the case, most likely is ur asus problem? just drop the aztech totally already
    Whatever floats your boat...

  5. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by static369 View Post
    Yes I'm using the aztech router because of the package.after much googling, also found that some users face slow connection speed when connected directly to asus router.
    i think I face the same issue with Asus AC68U. The speed drops significantly from 500Mbps to 200Mbps using wired connection directly to ONT. After I placed back Aztech FG7003GRV(AC)-J router, it crawls back to 500Mbps. Something not right. Anyone can advise?

  6. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by forresttan View Post
    i think I face the same issue with Asus AC68U. The speed drops significantly from 500Mbps to 200Mbps using wired connection directly to ONT. After I placed back Aztech FG7003GRV(AC)-J router, it crawls back to 500Mbps. Something not right. Anyone can advise?
    Did u enable "hardware acceleration" ? More info about it.
    24/7/365 Powered By :
    (>'-')> Sophos_UTM + fq_codel <('-'<)
    ┏(°>°)┛ RIPE Atlas Probe ┗(°<°)┓
    /˚>˚/ PRTG ...etc \˚<˚\

    ^-(ツ)-^

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. WTS: WTS Asus RT-N66U and Asus RT-AC68U
    By mzxc152 in forum Networking Devices
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Apr 26th, 14, 03:27 PM
  2. [SOLD] BNIB Asus RT-AC68U
    By Migoto in forum Networking Devices
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Mar 25th, 14, 05:11 PM
  3. [SOLD] Asus AC68u
    By jmng14 in forum Networking Devices
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Feb 8th, 14, 01:52 AM
  4. WTB: ASUS AC66U or AC68U
    By shixin1860 in forum Networking Devices
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Dec 12th, 13, 04:16 PM
  5. MWTB: Asus RT-AC68U & Asus PCE-AC68
    By Jolow99 in forum Networking Devices
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sep 22nd, 13, 11:32 PM